Розділ: Повідомлення

Proud Boys Member Pleads Guilty of Seditious Conspiracy in Capitol Riot 

A North Carolina man pleaded guilty Thursday of plotting with other members of the far-right Proud Boys to violently stop the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election, making him the first member of the extremist group to plead guilty to a seditious conspiracy charge. 

Jeremy Joseph Bertino, 43, has agreed to cooperate with the Justice Department’s investigation of the role that Proud Boys leaders played in the mob’s attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, a federal prosecutor said. 

Bertino’s cooperation could increase the pressure on other Proud Boys charged in the siege, including former national chairman Henry “Enrique” Tarrio. 

The guilty plea comes as the founder of another extremist group, the Oath Keepers, and four associates charged separately in the January 6 attack stand trial on a seditious conspiracy charge — a rarely used Civil War era offense that calls for up to 20 years behind bars. 

Bertino traveled to Washington with other Proud Boys in December 2020 and was stabbed during a fight, according to court documents. He was not in Washington for the January 6 riot because he was still recovering from his injuries, court papers say. 

Bertino participated in planning sessions in the days leading up to January 6 and received encrypted messages as early as January 4 indicating that Proud Boys were discussing possibly storming the Capitol, according to authorities. 

A statement of offense filed in court says that Bertino understood the Proud Boys’ goal in traveling to Washington was to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s victory and that the group was prepared to use force and violence if necessary to do so. 

Bertino also pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawfully possessing firearms in March 2022 in Belmont, North Carolina. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly agreed to release Bertino pending a sentencing hearing, which wasn’t immediately scheduled. 

Justice Department prosecutor Erik Kenerson said sentencing guidelines for Bertino’s case recommend a prison sentence ranging from four years and three months to five years and three months. 

A trial is scheduled to start in December for Tarrio and four other members charged with seditious conspiracy: Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl and Dominic Pezzola. The charging document for Bertino’s case names those five defendants and a sixth Proud Boys member as his co-conspirators. 

The indictment in Tarrio’s case alleges that the Proud Boys held meetings and communicated over encrypted messages to plan for the attack in the days leading up to January 6. On the day of the riot, authorities say, Proud Boys dismantled metal barricades set up to protect the Capitol and mobilized, directed and led members of the crowd into the building. 

Video testimony by Bertino was featured in June at the first hearing by the House committee investigating January 6. The committee showed Bertino saying that the group’s membership “tripled, probably” after Trump’s comment at a presidential debate that the Proud Boys should “stand back and stand by.” 

Tarrio wasn’t in Washington on January 6, but authorities say he helped put into motion the violence that day. Police arrested Tarrio in Washington two days before the riot and charged him with vandalizing a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic Black church during a protest in December 2020. Tarrio was released from jail on January 14 of this year after serving his five-month sentence for that case. 

More than three dozen people charged in the Capitol riot have been identified by federal authorities as leaders, members or associates of the Proud Boys. Two — Matthew Greene and Charles Donohoe — pleaded guilty of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, the January 6 joint session of Congress for certifying the Electoral College vote. 

your ad here
By Polityk | 10/07/2022 | Повідомлення, Політика

Україна з’ясовує ситуацію з українцями на російсько-естонському кордоні – МЗС

У Мінреінтеграції повідомили, що на російських кордонах з Латвією та Естонією спостерігається накопичення громадян України, які намагаються виїхати з території РФ. Люди стоять у чергах від двох до шести днів

your ad here
By Gromada | 10/06/2022 | Повідомлення, Суспільство

Зубні коронки, знайдені на Харківщині, російські військові могли викрасти у місцевого стоматолога – Bild

У результаті наступу на Харківщині у вересні українські сили звільнили близько 8500 тисяч квадратних кілометрів території, а разом з цим виявили і багато знахідок, часто – трагічних і жахливих

your ad here
By Gromada | 10/06/2022 | Повідомлення, Суспільство

Supreme Court Takes Up Key Voting Rights Case From Alabama

The Supreme Court is taking up an Alabama redistricting case that could have far-reaching effects on minority voting power across the United States. 

The justices are hearing arguments Tuesday in the latest high-court showdown over the federal Voting Rights Act, lawsuits seeking to force Alabama to create a second Black majority congressional district. About 27% of Alabamians are Black, but they form a majority in just one of the state’s seven congressional districts. 

The court’s conservatives, in a 5-4 vote in February, blocked a lower court ruling that would have required a second Black majority district in time for the 2022 midterm elections. 

A similar ruling to create an additional Black majority district in Louisiana also was put on hold. 

Conservative high-court majorities have made it harder for racial minorities to use the Voting Rights Act in ideologically divided rulings in 2013 and 2021. A ruling for the state in the new case could weaken another powerful tool civil rights groups and minority voters have used to challenge racial discrimination in redistricting. 

The case also has an overlay of partisan politics. Republicans who dominate elective office in Alabama have been resistant to creating a second district with a Democratic-leaning Black majority that could send another Democrat to Congress. 

Two appointees of President Donald Trump were on the three-judge panel that unanimously held that Alabama likely violated the landmark 1965 law by diluting Black voting strength. 

The judges found that Alabama has concentrated Black voters in one district, while spreading them out among the others to make it impossible for them to elect a candidate of their choice. 

Alabama’s Black population is large enough and geographically compact enough to create a second district, the judges found. 

The state argues that the lower court ruling would force it to sort voters by race, insisting that it is taking a “race neutral” approach to redistricting. 

That argument could resonate with conservative justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts. He has opposed most consideration of race in voting both as a justice and in his time as a lawyer in Republican presidential administrations. 

Tuesday’s arguments are the first Supreme Court case involving race for Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black female justice. 

A challenge to affirmative action in college admissions is set for arguments on October 31.

 

your ad here
By Polityk | 10/04/2022 | Повідомлення, Політика
попередні наступні